The Next Gen of Renters: Mom and Dad – Renters over 60 Grew by 43% in a Decade

Today’s demographics look substantially different than they did only a decade ago due to America’s population of seniors renting growing significantly and at a very fast pace. According to Census data, the U.S. is a rapidly aging country, with more than 22% of the current population being aged 60 & over.

The overall aging of the population is not just the result of the economic hardship following the 2007 Great Recession, reflected in declining birth rates, but also the result of the Baby Boom cohort, America’s largest living adult generation, passing age 53 in 2017.

Our research shows that as the 60+ cohort grew bigger and faster, it also helped push the national median age from 36.7 in 2007 to 38.1 in 2017, the highest it’s ever been.

Taking into consideration the decline in births, as well as the higher life expectancy, this trend will likely continue uninterrupted. But which parts of the country have contributed more to this rapid graying of America?

The oldest cities by median age in the U.S. are popular retirement spots

Our top 30 oldest cities all have a median age over 39.6 and are mostly retirement cities in Florida, California, or Arizona. In fact, Florida is home to 12 of the oldest cities, with Cape Coral, first in our top, boasting a median age of 47.9, followed by Hialeah, with 46.5. Sunny Scottsdale, AZ is third in our top, with a median age of 46, proving once more its high popularity among retirees in search of warm days and entertainment.

Check out the full list of oldest cities by median age here.

The population’s median age increase is also reflected in the median household age that saw a steady increase over the 10-year period, reaching 52 in 2017.

Renter households over 60 are up by 43%, outpacing owner households and growing faster than other age groups

As expected, renter householders tend to be younger, with a median age of 42 in 2017, compared to owner householders that had a median age of 56 in the same year. Moreover, the rapid aging of householders is visible throughout the 10-year period analyzed with both renter and owner householders getting older. But the median age of renters has been slowly closing the gap over the last decade.

Renter households aged 60 and over drove the past decade’s surge in seniors renting, with a 43% increase, from 6.551M to 9.37M in 2017, greatly outpacing younger age groups. While those aged 35 to 59 grew by 17% from 16.325M to 19.111M, renters aged under 35 witnessed the slowest increase rate of 7%, growing from 13.987M to 14.898M in a decade. Likewise in net numbers, the U.S. gained more new senior renter households in the past ten years than in either of the two younger renter age groups.

Stemming from a decline in homeownership, older renter households increased faster than older owner households – 43% versus 31%. The rapid growth of the 60+ population is also visible across owner households as the only increase in the 10-year period between 2007 and 2017 was witnessed by seniors over 60. Those aged 34 and under saw a 19% decrease and owner households between 35 and 59 decreased by 12%.

Past studies we conducted show that the older population is no longer enthusiastic about homeownership, with many seniors starting to downsize and move into rentals. As their children move out, they find themselves alone, in a big house that costs a lot to maintain, causing them to rethink their housing choices.

Austin boasts the highest 10-year percentage change in the share of older renter households

Out of the 30 most populous cities in the U.S., 16 experienced an increase of over 40% in the 60+ renter household share between 2007 and 2017. Austin, TX takes the first place as the city with the highest percentage change in the share of 60+ renter households, increasing by 113% in the 10-year period. Phoenix, AZ is also present in this top with the second highest increase of 112% and it’s followed by another Texas city: Fort Worth, with 95%.

Rounding up this list are the following cities: Denver; Detroit, MI; Las Vegas; Los Angeles; Memphis, TN; San Jose, CA; and Seattle, WA.

60+ Seniors renting in the top 30 largest U.S. cities

City/State	10 Year change	Share of 60+ renters	No. of 60+ renters
Austin, TX	113%	12%	24,819
Phoenix, AZ	112%	17%	40,705
Fort Worth, TX	95%	16%	20,799
Jacksonville, FL	83%	17%	26,721
Charlotte, NC	66%	13%	20,939
Dallas, TX	62%	14%	43,534
Houston, TX	61%	15%	73,366
San Antonio, TX	59%	16%	37,191
Louisville, KY	58%	20%	19,935
Denver, CO	52%	16%	23,896
Detroit, MI	48%	24%	33,280
Las Vegas, NV	46%	21%	23,840
Los Angeles, CA	45%	20%	178,030
Memphis, TN	44%	18%	23,871
San Jose, CA	43%	18%	24,413
Seattle, WA	41%	17%	29,157
Columbus, OH	36%	15%	29,160
Washington, D.C.	35%	20%	31,977
Philadelphia, PA	33%	21%	64,588
San Diego, CA	32%	16%	41,771
Boston, MA	32%	21%	36,016
Nashville, TN	32%	13%	16,898
Portland, OR	30%	18%	21,858
Chicago, IL	28%	20%	118,369
Baltimore, MD	28%	25%	31,139
San Francisco, CA	26%	24%	54,188
Indianapolis, IN	24%	16%	24,783
El Paso, TX	23%	19%	17,775
New York, NY	20%	27%	572,132
Oklahoma City, OK	20%	17%	15,952

Data Source: Census Bureau, ACS 2007 to 2017 1-year estimates

On the other hand, New York had the largest share of 60+ renter households in 2017 – of 27% or 572,130 renter households. It’s also important to point out that New York is the only one in our top to have more 60+ renter households than under 34. However, this might not come as an absolute surprise if we think about the city’s infamously high rents, generally unaffordable to those under 34.

The second highest share of 60+ renter households is claimed by Baltimore, MD – of 25%, followed by Detroit, MI and San Francisco, CA with 24%. All top 11 cities have over 20% shares of older renter households, including Las Vegas, NV, Philadelphia, PA, Boston, MA, Chicago, IL, Los Angeles, CA, Louisville, KY, and Washington, D.C.

Still, these locations have significantly highest shares of 60+ renter households than Nashville, TN (13%); Charlotte, NC (13%); Dallas (14%); Columbus, OH (15%); Houston (15%); Indianapolis (16%); San Diego, CA (16%); and San Antonio, TX (16%).

Click here to see the share of 60+ seniors renting in over 300 cities.

By 2035, the share of 60+ seniors renting is projected to keep growing while that of all other age groups will decrease

According to our projection based on the trend witnessed between 2007 and 2017, we expect the year 2035 will mark a major demographic shift with the share of 60+ renter households reaching somewhere around 31% and becoming the second highest share among all age groups. Despite being the majority, those aged between 35 and 59 will likely see a decrease in their share of renter households, dropping from 44% in 2017 to an estimated 43% in 2035. However, the most notable decline is projected to take place among those aged 34 and under, with their to decrease from 34% to 27% by 2035.

In terms of net numbers, the 60+ seniors renting cohort is expected to grow to an estimated 18.6M by 2035 and will become the second largest group of renter households, surpassing those aged 34 and under.

This growing share of older Americans is bound to have an impact on the U.S. real estate market. This is a cohort of people that witnessed firsthand the impact of the 2007 housing crisis and the re-shaping of the economy, forcing most of them to give up their homeowner status and move into rental apartments. It’s important for developers to acknowledge the particular housing needs of senior renters and make sure that they are being met.

Use the interactive table below to find out more about renter age groups in your city. Noteworthy of a mention is the fact that of the over 300 cities analyzed, 24 cities have larger numbers of senior renting over 60 years of age than young renters under 35 years of age (highlighted in green).

City/State	Median Age (Pop.)	Renters 60+ Share	Renters 34 to 59 Share	Renters 34 & under Share
Cape Coral, FL	47.9	29.6%	48.0%	22.5%
Hialeah, FL	46.5	32.4%	52.8%	14.8%
Scottsdale, AZ	46	24.6%	39.1%	36.3%
Pompano Beach, FL	45.5	28.6%	46.2%	25.2%
Carlsbad, CA	45.4	23.8%	56.3%	19.9%
St. Petersburg, FL	44.8	23.3%	43.2%	33.5%
Surprise, AZ	44.3	21.5%	57.0%	21.5%
Glendale, CA	43.9	34.6%	44.2%	21.2%
Thousand Oaks, CA	43.6	25.8%	47.8%	26.4%
Port St. Lucie, FL	43.3	26.4%	54.2%	19.4%
Henderson, NV	43.1	28.3%	40.6%	31.1%
Torrance, CA	42.9	16.6%	57.7%	25.7%
Huntington Beach, CA	42.8	21.4%	49.4%	29.2%
Spring Hill, FL	42.4	21.1%	56.4%	22.5%
Clearwater, FL	42.3	26.6%	48.7%	24.7%
Fort Lauderdale, FL	42.1	22.7%	47.8%	29.6%
The Woodlands, TX	41.6	15.2%	56.9%	27.8%
Centennial, CO	41	19.9%	51.8%	28.3%
Lakeland, FL	41	26.7%	41.1%	32.2%
Peoria, AZ	41	33.1%	41.3%	25.6%
Metairie, LA	40.3	19.4%	44.1%	36.5%
Sparks, NV	40.3	29.7%	38.6%	31.8%
Cary town, NC	39.9	16.0%	41.4%	42.6%
Arvada, CO	39.8	19.3%	39.5%	41.2%
Miami, FL	39.8	25.2%	51.7%	23.1%
West Palm Beach, FL	39.7	19.0%	49.4%	31.6%
Pembroke Pines, FL	39.7	23.4%	41.6%	34.9%
Vacaville, CA	39.7	29.3%	46.9%	23.7%
Simi Valley, CA	39.7	23.4%	56.7%	19.9%
Hollywood, FL	39.6	22.3%	51.9%	25.8%
Warren, MI	39.6	20.0%	48.3%	31.7%
Sterling Heights, MI	39.6	30.1%	40.8%	29.1%
Garden Grove, CA	39.6	26.1%	52.2%	21.7%
Highlands Ranch, CO	39.6	24.4%	50.4%	25.2%
Springfield, IL	39.4	19.6%	47.0%	33.3%
Concord, CA	39.3	23.6%	51.6%	24.8%
Roseville, CA	39.3	21.8%	50.9%	27.3%
Oceanside, CA	39	27.3%	39.1%	33.6%
Burbank, CA	38.9	27.5%	39.0%	33.4%
Plano, TX	38.9	15.5%	52.4%	32.1%
Billings, MT	38.8	27.2%	33.9%	38.9%
San Mateo, CA	38.7	22.1%	47.7%	30.2%
San Buenaventura, CA	38.7	24.0%	47.7%	28.2%
Yonkers, NY	38.7	27.5%	51.5%	21.0%
Naperville, IL	38.7	20.1%	45.3%	34.5%
Santa Rosa, CA	38.5	31.6%	37.2%	31.2%
Overland Park, KS	38.5	23.5%	38.0%	38.5%
Palm Bay, FL	38.5	24.6%	51.9%	23.4%
Allen, TX	38.4	26.6%	54.1%	19.3%
San Francisco, CA	38.3	23.7%	41.9%	34.4%
Chattanooga, TN	38.2	22.4%	40.9%	36.8%
Pueblo, CO	38.1	24.6%	42.7%	32.7%
Stamford, CT	38	23.5%	48.7%	27.7%
Davenport, IA	38	26.1%	36.2%	37.8%
Lakewood, CO	37.9	21.3%	39.3%	39.3%
Daly City, CA	37.9	22.4%	39.2%	38.4%
Elk Grove, CA	37.9	26.5%	56.0%	17.5%
Independence, MO	37.8	26.6%	42.4%	31.1%
Las Vegas, NV	37.8	21.2%	48.8%	30.0%
Brandon, FL	37.7	16.6%	56.2%	27.3%
Columbia, MD	37.6	19.1%	46.1%	34.7%
Davie town, FL	37.6	12.7%	41.3%	45.9%
Bellevue, WA	37.4	12.1%	43.4%	44.5%
Spring Valley, NV	37.4	18.4%	48.5%	33.1%
Pasadena, CA	37.4	20.7%	45.1%	34.1%
Fremont, CA	37.4	13.6%	56.1%	30.3%
Carrollton, TX	37.4	11.7%	57.3%	31.0%
Huntsville, AL	37.3	17.5%	40.3%	42.2%
Coral Springs, FL	37.3	15.3%	58.3%	26.4%
Mobile, AL	37.3	20.1%	42.4%	37.4%
Chandler, AZ	37.3	16.4%	53.0%	30.6%
Evansville, IN	37.2	22.0%	41.8%	36.2%
Rockford, IL	37.2	21.2%	41.3%	37.5%
Gresham, OR	37.2	21.8%	47.7%	30.5%
Vancouver, WA	37.1	23.1%	41.7%	35.1%
Green Bay, WI	37.1	20.6%	43.5%	35.9%
Salem, OR	37.1	22.8%	49.3%	27.9%
Alexandria, VA	37	12.0%	53.1%	34.9%
West Covina, CA	37	21.0%	48.9%	30.0%
Santa Clarita, CA	37	24.1%	52.5%	23.4%
Albuquerque, NM	37	21.1%	42.6%	36.3%
High Point, NC	36.9	24.2%	43.2%	32.7%
Louisville, KY	36.9	20.0%	43.1%	36.9%
Portland, OR	36.8	17.7%	41.7%	40.6%
Broken Arrow, OK	36.8	24.1%	37.7%	38.3%
San Jose, CA	36.8	17.8%	50.6%	31.6%
New Orleans, LA	36.7	19.9%	46.9%	33.1%
Oakland, CA	36.7	21.8%	50.1%	28.1%
Chesapeake, VA	36.7	25.2%	44.5%	30.3%
Wilmington, NC	36.7	21.4%	34.0%	44.5%
Sandy Springs, GA	36.6	14.1%	44.1%	41.8%
Paradise, NV	36.6	19.4%	46.2%	34.4%
Topeka, KS	36.6	24.4%	32.5%	43.1%
New York, NY	36.6	26.9%	46.6%	26.5%
Tampa, FL	36.6	19.4%	43.4%	37.2%
Hampton, VA	36.6	20.0%	42.8%	37.3%
Westminster, CO	36.6	14.4%	39.3%	46.4%
Frisco, TX	36.6	16.9%	49.4%	33.7%
Vallejo, CA	36.5	20.2%	47.5%	32.3%
Richardson, TX	36.5	19.7%	44.7%	35.7%
Norwalk, CA	36.5	19.8%	55.7%	24.5%
Peoria, IL	36.5	25.4%	36.0%	38.6%
Inglewood, CA	36.5	25.8%	52.0%	22.3%
Fullerton, CA	36.4	17.8%	53.0%	29.2%
Akron, OH	36.4	21.3%	40.9%	37.8%
Greensboro, NC	36.4	20.1%	42.2%	37.7%
Cleveland, OH	36.2	21.9%	43.9%	34.2%
Virginia Beach, VA	36.2	16.2%	40.5%	43.3%
Little Rock, AR	36.2	17.8%	43.2%	39.0%
Antioch, CA	36.2	19.7%	53.1%	27.2%
Sunnyvale, CA	36.1	8.9%	49.2%	41.9%
Winston-Salem, NC	36.1	21.6%	41.9%	36.5%
Boise City, ID	36.1	18.6%	38.7%	42.6%
Montgomery, AL	36	17.8%	45.2%	37.0%
Rochester, MN	35.9	20.0%	31.0%	49.0%
Cedar Rapids, IA	35.9	18.4%	37.3%	44.3%
Wichita, KS	35.9	23.6%	38.1%	38.3%
Tacoma, WA	35.9	23.4%	38.4%	38.2%
Miramar, FL	35.9	14.4%	56.1%	29.5%
McKinney, TX	35.9	19.7%	53.2%	27.1%
Elgin, IL	35.9	16.6%	56.9%	26.5%
McAllen, TX	35.9	13.4%	58.8%	27.9%
Birmingham, AL	35.8	20.8%	39.1%	40.1%
Jacksonville, FL	35.8	17.4%	44.7%	37.9%
Los Angeles, CA	35.8	20.3%	50.0%	29.7%
Lowell, MA	35.8	28.9%	36.4%	34.7%
Modesto, CA	35.8	19.6%	50.5%	29.9%
Spokane, WA	35.7	21.2%	33.1%	45.7%
Seattle, WA	35.6	16.7%	33.5%	49.8%
Lafayette, LA	35.6	26.0%	36.8%	37.1%
St. Louis, MO	35.6	22.0%	39.2%	38.8%
Fort Wayne, IN	35.6	22.0%	37.5%	40.5%
Mesa, AZ	35.6	16.9%	48.8%	34.4%
Thornton, CO	35.6	20.8%	44.2%	35.0%
Aurora, IL	35.6	15.7%	52.6%	31.7%
Arden-Arcade, CA	35.5	21.6%	41.1%	37.4%
Tulsa, OK	35.5	19.7%	41.5%	38.7%
Chula Vista, CA	35.5	15.9%	52.4%	31.7%
Toledo, OH	35.4	19.4%	43.2%	37.4%
Shreveport, LA	35.4	21.6%	43.6%	34.7%
Baltimore, MD	35.3	24.6%	41.8%	33.6%
Garland, TX	35.3	19.9%	52.7%	27.4%
Corpus Christi, TX	35.3	19.9%	43.4%	36.6%
Long Beach, CA	35.3	18.9%	49.1%	32.0%
Manchester, NH	35.2	20.3%	43.2%	36.5%
Orange, CA	35.2	17.2%	49.8%	33.1%
Eugene, OR	35.2	19.5%	33.3%	47.2%
Sacramento, CA	35.2	20.3%	43.5%	36.2%
Everett, WA	35.2	19.1%	44.9%	36.0%
Olathe, KS	35.2	18.3%	49.3%	32.4%
Richmond, CA	35.1	16.7%	54.0%	29.3%
Kansas City, MO	35.1	16.7%	39.6%	43.7%
Hayward, CA	34.9	13.0%	53.3%	33.7%
Murrieta, CA	34.9	24.9%	51.7%	23.4%
Temecula, CA	34.9	16.2%	60.9%	22.9%
Arlington, VA	34.8	13.1%	38.8%	48.1%
Reno, NV	34.8	24.1%	40.0%	35.9%
Sioux Falls, SD	34.8	22.3%	36.7%	41.1%
Bridgeport, CT	34.8	26.0%	47.5%	26.5%
Clovis, CA	34.8	21.4%	45.2%	33.4%
Tyler, TX	34.8	18.0%	47.5%	34.5%
Kent, WA	34.8	19.6%	44.5%	35.9%
El Monte, CA	34.8	19.0%	60.3%	20.7%
Colorado Springs, CO	34.7	17.5%	39.0%	43.5%
Waterbury, CT	34.7	32.6%	37.8%	29.7%
Charleston, SC	34.7	17.2%	34.9%	47.9%
Fairfield, CA	34.7	23.3%	45.1%	31.6%
Downey, CA	34.7	19.0%	51.7%	29.4%
Chicago, IL	34.6	20.5%	40.9%	38.6%
Detroit, MI	34.6	23.7%	44.9%	31.4%
Costa Mesa, CA	34.6	11.4%	46.7%	41.9%
Miami Gardens, FL	34.6	13.9%	57.5%	28.6%
Rancho Cucamonga, CA	34.6	17.0%	50.8%	32.2%
Denver, CO	34.5	16.1%	38.0%	45.9%
Omaha, NE	34.5	17.3%	40.3%	42.4%
San Diego, CA	34.5	15.6%	42.6%	41.8%
North Charleston, SC	34.5	17.5%	44.7%	37.9%
Philadelphia, PA	34.4	20.9%	41.8%	37.4%
Charlotte, NC	34.4	13.5%	43.5%	43.0%
Columbus, GA	34.4	20.1%	44.2%	35.7%
Aurora, CO	34.4	16.1%	47.2%	36.7%
Newark, NJ	34.4	20.7%	52.5%	26.8%
Elizabeth, NJ	34.4	20.7%	56.5%	22.9%
Vista, CA	34.4	9.1%	55.9%	35.0%
Gilbert town, AZ	34.4	12.5%	51.0%	36.4%
Nashville, TN	34.3	13.0%	40.1%	46.9%
Lexington, KY	34.3	14.7%	39.2%	46.1%
Santa Clara, CA	34.3	17.6%	42.5%	40.0%
Savannah, GA	34.3	20.5%	40.9%	38.5%
Anaheim, CA	34.3	17.5%	54.6%	27.9%
Amarillo, TX	34.3	19.2%	39.1%	41.8%
Indianapolis, IN	34.2	16.0%	40.1%	44.0%
Oklahoma City, OK	34.2	16.6%	41.9%	41.5%
Escondido, CA	34.2	20.0%	50.7%	29.3%
Worcester, MA	34.2	26.5%	40.9%	32.6%
Augusta-Richmond, GA	34.2	18.4%	48.6%	33.0%
Durham, NC	34.2	19.2%	37.7%	43.1%
Tucson, AZ	34.1	18.2%	38.5%	43.3%
Irvine, CA	34.1	13.3%	49.6%	37.1%
Lancaster, CA	34.1	20.5%	53.5%	26.1%
Richmond, VA	34	20.9%	35.3%	43.8%
Washington, DC	34	19.7%	38.7%	41.6%
Anchorage municipality, AK	34	14.4%	40.6%	45.0%
Springfield, MA	34	23.4%	50.3%	26.4%
Pomona, CA	33.9	18.8%	54.7%	26.6%
Jersey City, NJ	33.8	19.5%	44.4%	36.1%
Las Cruces, NM	33.8	12.3%	42.1%	45.6%
Phoenix, AZ	33.8	16.6%	47.6%	35.8%
Kansas City, KS	33.7	19.0%	40.4%	40.6%
Round Rock, TX	33.7	16.1%	53.3%	30.6%
Joliet, IL	33.7	20.5%	48.6%	30.9%
Des Moines, IA	33.6	16.8%	39.8%	43.4%
Memphis, TN	33.6	17.9%	44.0%	38.1%
San Antonio, TX	33.6	16.4%	43.0%	40.6%
Grand Prairie, TX	33.6	15.8%	47.7%	36.5%
Hillsboro, OR	33.5	18.8%	34.7%	46.5%
Dayton, OH	33.4	18.4%	47.2%	34.4%
Newport News, VA	33.4	16.7%	47.7%	35.6%
Raleigh, NC	33.4	13.9%	40.4%	45.7%
El Paso, TX	33.4	18.9%	41.5%	39.7%
Austin, TX	33.4	12.0%	37.7%	50.3%
Pittsburgh, PA	33.3	18.6%	28.9%	52.5%
Atlanta, GA	33.3	18.3%	39.7%	42.0%
Lansing, MI	33.3	18.0%	42.9%	39.1%
Rochester, NY	33.3	19.3%	40.2%	40.6%
Victorville, CA	33.3	20.2%	50.7%	29.1%
Beaumont, TX	33.2	12.3%	41.6%	46.1%
Ontario, CA	33.2	17.0%	50.0%	33.0%
Houston, TX	33.1	15.3%	44.1%	40.5%
Arlington, TX	33.1	11.3%	48.9%	39.7%
Jackson, MS	33	21.0%	42.5%	36.6%
Orlando, FL	33	14.5%	46.6%	39.0%
Corona, CA	33	15.8%	53.6%	30.6%
Buffalo, NY	32.9	17.5%	40.6%	41.9%
Fort Worth, TX	32.9	16.0%	43.0%	41.0%
Lincoln, NE	32.9	17.0%	32.3%	50.7%
Stockton, CA	32.9	18.8%	53.2%	28.1%
North Las Vegas, NV	32.9	16.6%	57.7%	25.7%
El Cajon, CA	32.8	18.4%	46.5%	35.1%
Wichita Falls, TX	32.8	17.8%	42.6%	39.5%
Sunrise Manor, NV	32.8	15.9%	47.2%	36.9%
Cincinnati, OH	32.7	19.2%	37.6%	43.2%
Lewisville, TX	32.7	11.5%	44.2%	44.3%
Springfield, MO	32.7	18.8%	33.4%	47.8%
Oxnard, CA	32.6	16.4%	54.5%	29.1%
Mesquite, TX	32.5	15.7%	50.4%	33.9%
Midland, TX	32.5	13.6%	33.8%	52.6%
Minneapolis, MN	32.4	14.5%	35.1%	50.4%
Glendale, AZ	32.4	14.6%	49.9%	35.5%
Dallas, TX	32.4	14.0%	43.6%	42.4%
Greeley, CO	32.4	19.6%	38.1%	42.2%
Boston, MA	32.3	20.7%	37.7%	41.6%
Columbus, OH	32.2	14.8%	39.2%	46.0%
Irving, TX	32.1	9.6%	50.9%	39.5%
Paterson, NJ	32	25.3%	52.3%	22.4%
Santa Ana, CA	32	15.9%	54.0%	30.1%
Providence, RI	32	25.6%	39.7%	34.7%
Knoxville, TN	31.9	16.6%	35.2%	48.2%
Milwaukee, WI	31.9	17.5%	41.7%	40.8%
East Los Angeles, CA	31.8	17.9%	56.5%	25.5%
Rialto, CA	31.7	15.6%	48.9%	35.5%
San Bernardino, CA	31.7	20.1%	51.2%	28.7%
Fresno, CA	31.5	22.2%	43.7%	34.1%
St. Paul, MN	31.4	19.6%	40.2%	40.2%
Salinas, CA	31.4	16.1%	53.2%	30.7%
Allentown, PA	31.3	19.2%	41.8%	39.0%
Madison, WI	31.3	13.9%	24.8%	61.3%
Palmdale, CA	31.3	12.6%	63.8%	23.6%
Bakersfield, CA	31.3	16.1%	44.7%	39.2%
Salt Lake City, UT	31.2	14.1%	34.7%	51.2%
Visalia, CA	31.2	17.1%	45.0%	37.8%
West Jordan, UT	31.2	10.2%	42.8%	47.0%
Abilene, TX	31.1	14.8%	29.6%	55.6%
Grand Rapids, MI	31.1	19.0%	35.2%	45.8%
West Valley City, UT	31	9.3%	45.4%	45.3%
Riverside, CA	30.9	18.8%	49.3%	31.9%
Baton Rouge, LA	30.8	17.2%	38.4%	44.4%
Pasadena, TX	30.7	16.2%	48.8%	35.0%
Fargo, ND	30.7	14.6%	25.8%	59.6%
Hartford, CT	30.7	24.0%	42.1%	33.9%
Syracuse, NY	30.7	17.5%	46.7%	35.8%
Cambridge, MA	30.5	16.4%	28.6%	55.0%
Norfolk, VA	30.5	19.0%	36.7%	44.2%
Moreno Valley, CA	30.5	13.8%	52.6%	33.6%
Fayetteville, NC	30.4	14.5%	38.7%	46.8%
New Haven, CT	30.4	16.4%	45.4%	38.3%
Brownsville, TX	30.3	25.5%	45.6%	28.9%
Odessa, TX	30.2	12.1%	46.7%	41.2%
Norman, OK	30.2	7.1%	31.9%	61.0%
Berkeley, CA	30	14.5%	34.9%	50.5%
Lubbock, TX	30	16.9%	29.8%	53.3%
Santa Maria, CA	30	11.1%	56.7%	32.2%
Tempe, AZ	29.9	8.5%	36.3%	55.2%
Denton, TX	29.9	14.7%	28.7%	56.6%
Clarksville, TN	29.8	8.6%	36.8%	54.6%
Fontana, CA	29.3	17.1%	57.9%	25.0%
Murfreesboro, TN	29.1	9.1%	30.7%	60.1%
Waco, TX	28.8	17.6%	32.2%	50.1%
Laredo, TX	28.8	22.2%	44.3%	33.5%
Killeen, TX	28.7	8.2%	37.6%	54.2%
Tuscaloosa, AL	28.6	14.2%	35.1%	50.7%
Fort Collins, CO	28.4	12.0%	26.0%	62.0%
Columbia, SC	28.1	16.8%	34.8%	48.4%
Athens-Clarke, GA	28.1	13.3%	35.4%	51.2%
Columbia, MO	28	12.3%	29.0%	58.7%
Ann Arbor, MI	27.7	13.6%	21.2%	65.2%
Boulder, CO	27.2	11.6%	25.9%	62.5%
Tallahassee, FL	27	8.0%	28.8%	63.2%
Gainesville, FL	26.7	13.2%	22.7%	64.2%
Provo, UT	24	6.3%	25.9%	67.8%
College Station, TX	22.9	6.9%	19.0%	74.0%

Data Source: Census Bureau, ACS 2007 to 2017 1-year estimates

Methodology

• This report was compiled by RentCafe.com, a nationwide apartment search website that enables renters to easily find apartments and houses for rent throughout the United States.
• Tenure of occupied housing units by age was obtained from Census ACS 1-year estimates for 2001-2017 at national and city level.
• Median age by population at U.S and city level was obtained from the same sources.
• In order to compare data, we created 3 age groups, aggregated from existing age groups and compared resulting data from 2007 & 2017.
• For this research, we analyzed more than 300 cities with a population of over 100,000.
• For the 2035 projection, we used data from Census – American Community Survey 1-year estimates: 2007 to 2017, Households by tenure and Age estimates. We based the projection on historical trends y-o-y from 2007 & 2017 and kept the homeownership rate at 2017 level for each age group. While the future growth in older households is confirmed by other sources, the results should be considered rough estimates and are subjected to change.